Skip to main content
Three-dimensional CT enterography versus barium follow-through examination in measurement of remnant small intestinal length in short bowel syndrome patients.
Title Three-dimensional CT enterography versus barium follow-through examination in measurement of remnant small intestinal length in short bowel syndrome patients.
Authors Cheng, W.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J.; Zhou, C.; Li, Y.; Li, J.
Journal Abdom Radiol (NY)
DOI 10.1007/s00261-018-1597-x
Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of remnant small intestinal length measured by barium follow-through (BaFT) examination and three-dimensional CT enterography (CTe).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine consecutive short bowel syndrome patients (SBS) who underwent BaFT, CTe, and prior surgical measurements of small intestine were included. Measurements of total remnant small intestinal length on BaFT and CTe were compared to surgical measurements using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman plots, and paired t test.

RESULTS: The average remnant intestinal length was 73.1 ± 37.2 cm according to surgical measurement. There was a significant positive correlation between CTe and surgical measurement (r = 0.99; p  0.0001), and a relatively weaker correlation between BaFT and surgical measurement (r = 0.71; p  0.001). Compared with surgical measurement, the percentage differences of CTe and BaFT were 5.71 ± 6.71% and 27.14 ± 18.41% (mean ± SD), respectively. Furthermore, Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between CTe and surgical measurement, whereas relatively poor agreement between BaFT and surgical measurement. However, significant difference was found among the three measurement methods by paired t test (p  0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of remnant small intestinal length by CTe is accurate and acceptable for clinical application, whereas BaFT is less accurate although BaFT is more convenient and cheaper for clinical application. And CTe can provide a cost-effective and noninvasive determination of remnant small intestinal length in planning surgical and nutritional intervention in SBS patients.